Tuesday, 13 February 2018
Written by Mathew Naismith
What is wise to understand is that when people like me seem derogative, we are not really being derogative, only a perception of negatives and positives will judge like this. If I call the human race a virus that is devouring its host, this isn't being derogative as there is no perception of a negative, it's simply stating a fact of how humans can behave. This kind of behaviour is quite natural for the human species to express up to date, of course if the human species allowed itself to consciously evolve even further, this kind of behaviour simply wouldn't and couldn't exist, I will explain.
What is or isn't negative or positive to the observer is completely different the participator, mainly because there are no negatives or positives perceptions when of the observer. The more of the observer we become, the less motion is expressed therefore the less of the perceptions of negatives and positives we judge/perceive. Also, the more of the observer we become, the less we feel love and light because we are love and light. Feelings are of a high degree of motion therefore participation.
The participator judges more negatives and positives the more of the participator we become, this is probably why the expressions like toxic and negative are used so frequently these days in Westernised spirituality. You see the more of the participator we become, the more perceived negatives and positive we perceive/judge.
OK, on one end of the scale negatives are ignored and/or denounced because they are toxic to our own positive vibrations. On the other end of the scale we have materialists who ignore what they have created, for example, child and adolescent prostitution. In the middle of the scale we have people like me who are not ignorant to these things, this is simply because these motions are not critically judged as being negative as it's natural for a leech to leech/sponge off of a victim/host.
How many of the elite create and then live off of sick dying people? How many of the elite create a reality that feeds off of other people in one sense or another? Cannibalism comes to mind which was and still is a part of some people's reality around the world, it's certainly a part of the elite's reality which is then forced upon the rest of humanity.
Is the human species acting like a virus, a leach and a cannibal negative?
Is an actual leach type creature negative because it naturally feeds off of other animals? Is a virus negative because it naturally devours its host and is a cannibal negative while naturally existing within its own environment?
A spiritual person goes into a forest and immediately feels all these positive vibrations, this is while at the same time the forest is all about a dog eat dog world. Are other animals praying off of other animals, each other and plants negative, why is it then negative for the human species to act in this way?
The human species is a part of the natural environment, this is too obvious in the way the human species mimics so much of the natural environment, the difference is, the human species somehow puts itself above what it mimics. Also, a leech is a leach as a virus is a virus as a cannibal is a cannibal, they are what they are void of being like each other, however, the human species is expressive of all of these motions and more, the question is now, is the expression of all these motions, all these participations, representative of an evolving consciousness?
Yes, the observer observes that some parts of the human species is expressive of these motions of the natural environment, this is completely natural for a species to do when it puts itself above all other species and forms of existence, the point is, not everyone of the human species expresses themselves in this way.
Yes, the human species is a part of nature but it's also a part of a different natural state of existence, an existence that is of the observer rather than a participator.
The universe itself is all about participation, motion, everything it creates is of participation; this is what we call nature, a natural environment of motion. This however is not the only natural environment we are a part of; we are also a part of the observer of participation.
The observer can be of love void of having to feel love first to be of love, in actuality the feeling of love is negated through being love instead of just feeling love. The participator on the other hand has to feel love, within this motion it will never become truly of love because there is simply no observation of love, just participation of love. Can we stop acting like a leech, a virus and a cannibal if we are still in participation of these motions? Only through observation is human consciousness able to evolve, of course observation is of awareness, the more we observe, the more we become aware.
Yes, it's hard to imagine, in a reality, a universe, of a high degrees of motion, one seemingly has to express love to be of love, basically, to put love into motion. Imagine being love without having to feel love. It's hard to imagine only because we are conditioned to participation rather than observation. As there are no perceptions of negatives or positives in observation, there are no feelings of love, joy, harmony and so on, they are simply not needed to be of these motions. Imagine being of motions void of motions, simply a motionless state of being of everything void of judgment or bias.
Yes, the natural environment of motion, the universe, tricks us to think we have to put everything into motion to be of that motion, this could not be further from the truth for we are more than motion could ever express in one state of motion. Motion represents a very tiny part of who we are as a whole; only through being aware of this will human consciousness evolve. Yes, we are a part of our environment but only a tiny part, the rest is often obscured through excessive motion.
All of creation is not based on the perceptions of negatives and positives, good and bad, wrong and right, love or not love and so on, separation period, perceptions are simply created and perceived, they are not the bases of all of creation.
Yes, man could have been a butterfly, he simply chose differently........
Monday, 9 June 2014
Written by Mathew Naismith
A caterpillar will only become aware of it’s truer purpose to life once it nourishes itself on the fruits of life to finally become what it was all along, a butterfly. While living as a caterpillar, it is ignorant of it’s truer self and purpose to life. The question is, are we the caterpillar or the butterfly?
Some people are caterpillars, some people are butterflies but some are also pupating between these two distinctly different existences, does it matter which one we are and the answer is of course is no because we are all butterflies in a sense.
Not all caterpillars become butterflies because of life’s ventures; this is no big deal as we will get it next time around. The reasons some of these caterpillars don’t become butterflies will be because of lack of nourishment, for it’s within our nourishment will we find our truer selves and our truer purpose to life to finally become a butterfly. It does not matter how we nourish ourselves as along as we nourish ourselves enough to become what we truly are. You could look at nourishing ourselves through life as being awareness building, the more we nourish ourselves on the fruits of life the closer we are becoming aware of our truer selves and our truer purpose to life. Life itself is nourishment, it’s how we take this nourishment not what nourishment we take that defines if we will pupate into a butterfly or not. This is in reference to all systems of belief we take on, does it matter as long as we still become aware of our truer selves and our truer purpose to life?
Does it matter if we pray, meditate, eat right, sit right and so on? No because everything in life is nourishment, some of these nourishments will assist us more but in the end it’s how we take these nourishment that matter. If a butterfly nourishes itself on the correct food it will become aware of itself quicker but does it really matter if it takes longer eating less nourishing foods? I suppose it does to the ego but that is all. Judging that we must nourish ourselves in a certain way otherwise we are not doing it right is of the ego and ego is one nourishment that can extensively delay or cancel out the process of becoming a butterfly.
Yesterday I participated in our annual pub crawl in Maryborough QLD Australia; to some people they would judge this as being so and so which again is of the ego. No I wasn’t drunk at the end of the day, accept on life, but I was tipsy, actually very few people seemed inebriated on the day to any great extent. Like I said many people judge this as being so and so and again judgment denotes ego and the ego is one nourishment that can extensively delay or cancel out the process of becoming a butterfly. In all does this even matter how we become a butterfly as long as we do in the long or short run? It doesn’t to me.
I thought I would share a few pics from the day. I should also emphasis they don’t call this day a pub crawl anymore but a pub fest which is more socially accepted.