Showing posts with label ideologies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ideologies. Show all posts

Friday 31 January 2014

Perceiving & Spirituality


Written by Mathew Naismith

What we perceive we generally believe, all ideologies, including religious & science orientated ideologies, are a perception of one kind or another that usually block us from being aware of other perceived ideologies, the question is which one is right over all else? In timelessness there is no right or wrong but in time there is because in time everything seems fragmented & disconnected, time gives us fragmentation of consciousness, this also includes the way we all perceive.

Religion has tried to get us all perceiving in the same way which is less fragmented but by doing so has taken free thinking away, in other words we no longer think for ourselves to one extent or another, the ideology is thinking for us. We could ask here is free thinking fragmented consciousness & is religion of defragging of this consciousness to better connect us to consciousness itself (God)? Well it should be but we have so many religions perceiving in their own way which denotes fragmentation plus the controlling factors of the ego seem to always distort any real reconnection. Science & most other ideologies work in the same way, once we start defragging the fragmentation of consciousness we tend to end up with a controlling ego. When we incorporate the controlling factors of the ego we are once again end up with a consciousness that is fragmented.

Free thinking also seems fragmented but is it? If we all think differently we must all perceive differently thus it would seem we have a more fragmented consciousness than under an ideology of some kind. If we took the controlling factors out of the ego in regards to ideologies & had the same exact ideological thinking process yes collectively it would seem we would have a consciousness that would be far less fragmented however because we have different ideological thinking processes, thinking for themselves, we will always live within a fragmented consciousness. Free thinking, either it be individually or as a group, seems to lead to the fragmentation of consciousness before the controlling factors of the ego come into it.  This statement isn’t exactly true because ideologies are controlling, they think for us instead of thinking for ourselves, this denotes a controlling ego so the controlling factors of the ego are already at play before we try to defrag consciousness. There doesn’t seem to be an answer to proficiently defragment consciousness & bring consciousness back into it’s connected state because of the controlling factors of the ego or is there?  

The controlling factors of the ego seem to only exist in time, once we take the controlling ego out of the equation it would seem it would be very possible to reconnect consciousness back into it’s natural state of connectedness (oneness). I should enumerate here that we are not talking about the ego self but the controlling factor of the ego, there is a huge difference. Time is going to always produce fragmentation like the seemingly fragmentations of all our lives lived; I don’t look at it as many lives lived but one life lived under different perceived existences. This is done by thinking out of time (timelessness) to an extent which gives me very little fragmentations of my whole existence, the only fragmentation there is, is in the perception of different lives lived which can’t be avoided while remotely thinking & being in time.  Yes one can totally be with timelessness & be totally connected with consciousness itself but one would no longer be in time. One should ask oneself here, is it more egotistical to desire to exist in a connected consciousness of timelessness than continue living in a fragmented consciousness of time? What would a controlling ego choose?


The controlling factors of the ego is telling me that I have lived many lives but my ego self is telling me I lived one whole life seemingly separated by various perceived existences. The controlling ego is only of time but the ego self doesn’t have to be of time, it can’t totally exist in timelessness but it can be within the balance of time & timelessness & this is where all the beauty & oneness that we experience come from I believe. The pure essence of experiencing timelessness can be sequential to experiencing quietness within oneself as long as we can quell the controlling factors of the ego.  

Thursday 13 June 2013

Spirituality- Different Concepts Same Source


Written by Mathew Naismith


Different Concepts: I find it quite remarkable how so many people who are spiritually aware & connected to the same source can all get, from this same one source, something different in what the source is or is relaying to us. Everyone who is religious sees this source as a different God which portrays different ideological concepts & anyone who is spiritually aware but not of a religious order or doesn’t have a belief in a God of man but never the less believes in a creative source sees this source as something different as well to others, if it’s the same source why do we see this source differently?  We also have spiritually aware people who don’t believe in a higher creative source from themselves as they are the creative source itself which also induces a different ideological concept again but it still related to the same source, is one ideological concept wrong or right over the other? I don’t believe so.

To a non-believer of spirituality this would obviously seem quite lame or of blind faith which is fair enough because that is the way it looks, you have one source but many different perceived ideas & ideological beliefs coming from this one source so at this point it doesn’t look like it is one source but many so are we getting back to the concept of many Gods again not just one?  The real point of the question is, is there more than one source & how do we know there isn’t? Another point to make is these same people also see light & dark differently for example I’m comfortable in the dark as much as I am in the light & I don’t relate love just to light & not the dark but many others see it quite differently to this, this is in line with the way we perceive the source differently to others & we are like this with many things in life, we perceive the same things differently I believe.

When we look at this we should ask, what is the driving force behind our differences in concepts of the same thing, what are we made of that can sway us in any direction in the way we think & feel?  We could also ask another question here, what makes us think so differently as it’s obvious that it’s our own thoughts that give us all different perceptions of the same thing?   In the previous question I mentioned feel, it is obvious it’s the way we feel differently that give us our different thoughts & concepts.


Emotionally Driven: Emotions are of what we feel, if we see life differently our emotions are going to be different to others as no one’s emotions are ever the same as someone else’s & the same with our experiences so of course we are going to have different ideological concepts of the same thing as it’s all based on our emotions & experiences.  This seems lame because when we are connected we are at peace & feel at one with everything so how could it have anything to do with human emotions?  This is the funny thing, not everyone who becomes spiritually connected feels or experiences the same things just like we do in physical life, what is above is below!!

I’ve been connected at times & realised I could feel what I wanted too not just unconditional love or oneness but anything that one is able to feel in this physical reality & yes even hate. The reason I feel that most of us only feel unconditional love & oneness is it’s in opposition to what we detest in this reality, this reality has emotionally given us a different way to experience consciousness itself which is what we do anyway in this reality, what is above is below!!  So why can I feel what I want in this state of consciousness not just unconditional love or oneness & others can’t or more to the point don’t wish too? I don’t actually detest anything of this reality, I don’t like many things but I detest nothing for it is the way it is for that is what we have chosen to be which is quite obvious especially when we become connected more.  


“Life is like a butterfly until it’s squashed by an ant”….Love Mathew….. The butterfly can’t possibly emotionally perceive this while in flight & neither can we!!