Everyone dreams including materialists, so if a dream can't be substantiated by hard core facts, the dream didn't occur. This would mean a materialist can't discuss their dreams void of solid evidence that they had an actual dream!! Strange logic's for a people who have a go at other people's logic's or lack of.
I do understand materialist/atheist ideological views, especially when limited to primary materialist perspectives.
I do however use a lot of actual experiences and observation, at times supported by scientific evidence. In a sense, I have a right to talk about my dreams void of physical evidence. How do you debate or even question a non-psychical occurrence void of actual evidence? It's totally illogical to even try but materialists do exactly this which shows how illogical they too can be!!
Fact and truth; there is no knowable evidence of me having these dreams.
Fact and truth; I had these dreams even when the lack of evidence proves otherwise.
Fact and truth; the reliance on evidence to prove an occurrence occurred can often be flawed.
In my mind, we need to be more truthful with ourselves, evidence can be and is often flawed, this doesn't include actual tampering of evidence either!!