I recently realised that what I have always been writing about was beyond a non-evolutionary consciousness, a consciousness that doesn't want to change, this change of course takes one to let go of any present fixations to existing ideological concepts. I have changed the title of this blog for exactly this reason from The World of True Spiritual Acceptance to Evolutionary Consciousness. Allow yourself to evolve.
I thought I would share a few comments from a post titled
Faith, Mysticism & Philosophy to Science from Google community.
I don't think an atheist would have just flat-out reject
fire. I believe that one such man/woman would simply conclude that he/she has
no way of explaining the phenomenon.
Now, something that is a very common theme in all of
humanity is our inward instinct to want to know everything. Our brain, by its
nature, doesn't like not knowing everything. If we can't deduce a plausible
solution, we make one up.
Besides, as a caveman/woman, I would just be thankful that
the fire existed, because our ability to control fire is what led us to become
what we are today.
So what's the difference between fire & God or faith?
Atheists don't accept there being a God so with the same logic they wouldn't
accept fire either, they couldn't if they used the same logical thinking
process, it's logically impossible.
What they did use was faith, faith within the fire without
being able to logically understand how it was & how it worked so what's the
difference between that & a God or faith of today?
I'm a spiritually aware agnostic if I was going to give what
I believe a label which makes me a little more open minded to different
perceptions than most atheists so I can open my mind up to more possibilities
than a closed minded atheists obviously.
Logic points to people creating religion to explain what
they don't understand. I don't see how an atheist caveman's reaction to fire
has any connection. I'm sure the caveman(atheist or theist) would think fire
was magic and would keep a cautious distance. Maybe they might think it's a
message from a higher life form. Again, logic points to magic being the answer
when the answer is unclear. Some of us will reserve judgement until more facts
are in... Others will blindly cling to the first answer they hear.
We don't understand the human brain to it's fullest extent
but that's not of religion & neither is the universe because we can't even
agree in how it was first created & what about everything else we don't
understand about it.
If we used the same logical deductive reasoning that
atheists use today that we have with God or faith the cave man fire wouldn't
exist but it does obviously because we can see it but an atheists couldn't accept
this because it's not of any logic within their awareness or knowing. This same
concept is used to formulate an idea that God can't exist or that faith is
God or what I call consciousness collectively or not is like
the fire, it exists because we exist, in other words we are proof of a creative
consciousness or God exists, just because we can't logically give it definition
yet doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
A thousand years ago there was no way we could ever take
flight because that was logically impossible at the time. Logic changes with
our conscious awareness however some logic like atheist logic hasn't by the
looks of it. If it's not logical at the
time it can never exist, strange atheist concepts I have to admit however the
concepts of agnosticism are quite different.
I’ve been having quite an interesting discussion with an
atheist lately in how hypocritical atheism can be depending on the dogmatic attitude
of some atheists & how it is also of a belief but mostly how flawed the
beliefs/concepts/theories or whatever you want to call them are. Some atheists think if it isn’t of logic it
can’t be proved so it can’t have happened or it was a delusion of some kind.
Where did logical thinking & science derive from? Faith, mysticism &
philosophy, this is the way we were thinking before logic & science thought
became thought but we still evolved from living in caves & foraging for
food, how did we evolve without logic at first?
Below is part of my reply to an atheist that can’t or won’t
see that the beliefs of atheism are flawed & in fact they think they aren’t
beliefs at all but if you can’t prove something without a doubt it’s not fact
so if it’s not fact it must be of a belief, no one can prove or disprove God doesn’t
exist, this is a funny argument coming from a spiritually aware agnostic as
I experienced from
quite a young age phenomena that science can’t logically explain as yet but it
doesn’t make it delusional or unreal Paul just because science can’t logically
prove something, this is small minded thinking. A thousand yrs ago people knew
it was impossible for humans to ever gain flight or that we would ever have
motorised vehicles, just because it wasn’t logical back then doesn’t make it
illogical period Paul, this is a lame way of thinking Paul & thank God we
have foresighted thinkers because if we all thought like atheists back in the
cave man days that is exactly where we would still be obviously because nothing
could be proven logically back then especially by science there for we wouldn’t
have evolve through lack of logical proof. This way of thinking that everything
has to be logically proved before implemented Paul is utterly flawed!!
How did we evolve from
the caves without logic Paul? It was through faith & eventually science was
formed from faith, philosophy & mysticism, now this is fact Paul as this
actually happened & without logic.
You obviously haven’t
experienced any genuine spiritual phenomena Paul that can’t be explained as yet
by science but most of us here have, it doesn’t make us wrong or delusional
like you keep trying to say. Just because it’s scientifically illogical doesn’t
make it delusional or unreal Paul it just makes it unprovable at this point in
time to people who only think logically. Most of us here think outside the
logic square which to me denotes foresighted thinking.
If we were all born atheists & had the thinking capability
of an atheist back in the cave man days would have we accepted fire? We couldn’t
because we had no logical understanding or awareness in how fire existed. I
could see an atheist just putting out the fire because there was no logical
proof of its existence & this is no different with the existence of God or
a creative consciousness. The argument would be of course from an atheist is, “we
can see the fire exists but we can’t of a God &/or consciousness”, what are
we & of all of creation, we are God &/or consciousness. Just like the
fire it exists & just like the fire in the cave man days it still exists
without logical proof for the main reason we can neither logically prove nor
disprove such things just like fire in the cave man days so yes I can see atheists
back then putting out the fire.
All I can say is thank god our ancestors back then didn’t
think like some of us do today, we would have never evolved & this is why
the beliefs of atheism is flawed, it can’t possibly exist without logic. We didn’t
have the logical understanding of such things back then but we did have faith
& from faith mysticism &
philosophy evolved & from faith, mysticism & philosophy science was
created & evolved so really we have a lot to
thank faith for. So the big question here is, since we have evolved from cave
man days of faith to logical thinking do we need faith any longer? Logic gives us one thought perception or mode
of thought but faith gives us another which of course proved handy in our
evolutional thought process & perception for without faith we obviously wouldn’t
have evolved & I don’t think it’s any different today.