Showing posts with label spiritual. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spiritual. Show all posts

Thursday, 29 September 2016

Immunising Yourself Spiritually


Written by Mathew Naismith

I should firstly point out that this post isn't about the clinical representation of immunising but a spiritual one and yes, without us even knowing it, we do indeed immunise ourselves. So what are we unknowingly immunising ourselves against?

We, as humans, clinically immunise ourselves against the effects of viruses that affect us, spiritual immunising is the same, any excessive motion creates destruction, just like a virus. Spiritually aware people basically immunise themselves against excessive motion that is obvious within it's destructiveness. Just like a virus, excessive extreme motion often inundates less motionless motions, this is because this kind of motion is more active. It's like our own immune system, if our immune system is less active than a virus, the virus will most likely inundate the immune system and everything else attached to the immune system. In extreme circumstances, this can indeed cause the demise of a person or a motion. Excessive motion can indeed destroy everything human.

Basically, any excessive motion, especially if it's extreme within it's motion, is a virus or acts just like a virus.

Excessive motion = virus

Don't prejudge me as being negative here, viruses have been around since micro-organisms, they are a natural part of creation, I therefore don't judge viruses as being negative. Yes, as any excessive motion can become, active viruses can indeed be highly destructive. Liken this to Syria at present, the multinationals, with the aid of Israel, is pilfering Syria's oil and gas reserves, this action is highly motional and will only create destruction instead of peace. Like a virus, it's main concern is what it can get out of it's environment for itself. Highly active viruses are anything but peaceful, does this non-peacefulness make these people negative? Not at all  because they are a natural part of creation, this would be like going up to a volcano and stating to the volcano, it's bad and negative because it's highly destructive within it's motion.

We are now coming to the main point of the post. There are people who are still immunising themselves against excessive motion and there are people who have already immunised themselves against excessive motion. There are also people who are of this excessive motion that spiritually aware people often immunise themselves against the infection of excessive motions. Also, as of clinical immunising, spiritual immunisation doesn't always work, in serious circumstances, the immunisation can be as deadly or harmful as the viruses, human history reflects this quite well.

The question is, how do you know if you are truly immunised or not  infected by excessive motion?

Firstly, you try not to judge through a black and white mentality, meaning, you don't judge what is or isn't negative or positive for an example, you instead observe what is and isn't destructive while remembering not everything that is destructive is negative or bad.

Secondly, you immerse yourself in a true sense of love, this means loving and accepting what is and isn't destructive. Basically, you don't ignore everything you have judged as being negative or bad. Spiritual awareness is about being aware even of excessive extreme motions that are often highly destructive.

Thirdly, you don't participate in extremes, especially when in retaliation to another opposing extreme. This kind of action denotes a virus mentality, a mentality of black and white. It's natural for a truly immunised person to not express this kind of mentality, in actually it's impossible for them to do so.  

Now how do you now you are still in the immunisation process, meaning, you are still being immunised against excessive motion/virus?  

Point one, you will judge what is and isn't positive even though you are of a self-judged positive person. Even judging yourself positive, especially on a regular basis, denotes a black and white mentality.

Point two, you will most often stay away from what you have judged as negative vibrations. Anyone immune to these highly motional motions, won't be affected by the feelings of excessive motion. Anyone who is truly immunised, will feel a difference but won't judge a difference as negative or positive, this is all due to being immunised against excessive motion because they are seen to be no threat to them. We usually judge a negative or a positive in fear for example. A person in the process of being immunised, will often refer to themselves, and others like themselves, as being positive, being truthful here, this is in fear of being negative.

What about the people who are of excessive motion, how do you know you are of this excessive motion?

Any excessive motion, especially extreme motions, denote a person who is of excessive motion, for example, a person who is predominant within their materialistic motions/expressions void of any attribute that balances out materialism, is obvious within their own motions of being excessive. Spiritually aware people can also be caught up in expressing excessiveness, especially when in counteraction to something opposing them like any judged negative for example.

The question is, are people like me fully immunised?

Absolutely not as people like myself are obvious within their participation in motion. There might not be any expression of excessive motion or counteractive motion, but  a high degree of motion is till being expressed.

In all, try to realise that there is nothing wrong in being expressive of a virus, it's a natural part of creation, there is also nothing wrong or right in being immunised against excessive motions either. Yes, we are aware of how excessive motion (virus) can destroy for it's own purpose, there is a better more constructive way to exist, but this doesn't make excessive motions negative or bad in some way. I do know one of these multinationals was a pauper in his previous life, all he is doing now is experiencing the opposite, all be it to an extreme. Before judging, try to look at the big picture.


Don't get me wrong here, I  am by no way for excessive motion in any sense, be it spiritually or materialistically, but what is meant to be will be while knowing we do indeed have a choice in the way we exist. 

Until human consciousness can evolve from excessive motions, he will keep on experiencing a virus like reality, this is inevitable.........                    

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

Being Spiritual within Yourself


Written by Mathew Naismith

Extract: Spirituality is a process of personal transformation, either in accordance with traditional religious ideals, or, increasingly, oriented on subjective experience and psychological growth independently of any specific religious context. In a more general sense, it may refer to almost any kind of meaningful activity or blissful experience. There is no single, widely-agreed definition for the concept. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirituality

Spiritualism is quite different to spirituality, or being spiritual, in that spiritualism is more defined to the actual belief and communication with spirit’s/ghosts, this also includes reincarnation.  

Spiritual:  

Extract: 1. Of, relating to, consisting of, or having the nature of spirit; not material; supernatural: spiritual power.
2. Of, concerned with, or affecting the soul: spiritual guidance; spiritual growth.
3. Not concerned with material or worldly things: led a spiritual life.
4. Of or belonging to a religion; sacred: spiritual practices; spiritual music.

The thing about being spiritual is it’s not supposed to be about material or worldly things but we are often taught to manifest for our own desires, this is brought about by spirituality also being about meaningful activities and blissful experiences.  There seems to be also a definable difference here between being spiritually aware and being actually spiritual in oneself.  I often defined myself in being spiritually aware, full stop but that actually isn’t the case as for a lot of us who are not focused on our own blissful experiences.  

Let’s take a look at sages, shamans, Jesus and Buddha for an example, are they defined as being spiritually aware or spiritual in oneself or both?  These people conducted themselves in many meaningful activities and had many blissful experiences; this must make them spiritually aware rather than being spiritual in oneself?   

What does it take to manifest for our own desires?  Awareness, now what does it take to being spiritual in oneself? A lot more than just being aware, Jesus, Buddha, sages and shamans didn’t become aware overnight, it can take many hours of mental and/or physical pain, and like Jesus, they can take that pain with them to the very end, they are certainly not about manifesting for one’s desires.  

I’ve never manifested for my own desires since I’ve become aware some 40 years ago, I’ve actually done the opposite many times over to assist others, in this time all my needs, as opposed to desires, have been met to one degree or another . In this time I have also had many blissful experiences and many not so blissful experiences, I have not once manifested for such experiences blissful or not.

Now you could say people like Jesus and Buddha manifested for their own blissful experiences and yes they would have had many. As you become aware you experience many blissful moments, however, to a person who is being spiritual in oneself, these moments aren’t manifested, they are part of being spiritual in oneself, this also includes experiencing  not so blissful moments as well.  

These people didn’t just fixate themselves in feeling blissful as they became aware, they experienced everything to do with being spiritual in oneself rather than being spiritually aware.  Is there anything wrong in just being spiritually aware?  There is nothing wrong in this it’s just not being spiritual in oneself.  

Being spiritually aware is just about human development not spiritual development; becoming spiritually aware can help us to become aware of our own spirit, this is until we experience something that’s not so blissful, at this point we choose to only be in bliss. You could imagine if Jesus and Buddha did this, they would have stopped at just being spiritually aware and not gone on to being spiritual within themselves.

Is it worth becoming being spiritual within oneself and should everyone try to become spiritual in this way?

I can experience the most traumatic times and deal with the most obviously destructive people and still come out on top all the times, this is mainly due to realising that everyone has their own path to follow no matter how destructive that might be.  This actually answers the second question, “Should everyone try to become spiritual in this way?” Not if these experiences are not a part of your own path.  If you are fixated to just feeing bliss, that is your path, there are no right or wrong paths just different experiences.

There is something I feel we need to be aware of though, religion has time and time again made the same mistake in manifesting for it’s own desires which in the long run created even more disharmony.  I see so many people today doing the exact same thing, yes it sounds good to manifest for our own desires but it also sounded good when the various religions and churches made it sound good as well.  Everything is consciousness and we think we can manipulate it as we like to our own desires; we seem to be forgetting the cause and effect, action reaction, push and pull.

Pulling something in that feel like bliss to push something out that doesn’t feel like bliss is rejection, there is no acceptance here when everything is consciousness including what we are rejecting.  You don’t have to pull something in to push something out that is less desirable, this is active intentions. Passive intentions take one to change what seems undesirable to something more constructive, something that is more needed than desired.  A more constructive way to exist has become a need not a desire.

Buddha and Jesus felt a need that needed to be met, they didn’t feel a desire, desire would have taken to be of active intentions, pushing and pulling, rejection. They didn’t reject anything; they changed this destructive consciousness within themselves through a need not through a desire.  I said within themselves because it’s always within ourselves, we are not a separate consciousness, consciousness is consciousness no matter what, it’s all of the same consciousness, this is why it seems  strange to me why so many people reject any part of this conciseness to pull in a more desirable conscious experience .


Like Jesus, Buddha, sages and shaman, all you have to do is change this consciousness not reject it for something more blissful , what you have rejected doesn’t go away, as human history quite plainly shows us, but what we change can last forever if we do it for a need rather than a desire.