Pure Bliss-Pure Balance

Written by Mathew Naismith

"The purity of the world is defined by it's own purity within it's own actions"......Mathew

Definition of purity; Being undiluted or unmixed with extraneous material, it also means, the state of being unsullied by sin or moral wrong; lacking a knowledge of evil. The word extraneous is an interesting word to use for the definition of purity, extraneous defines an outside source, meaning, to be pure is to be unmixed with outside sources and influences, in other words it's pure in substance without any extreme influences.

It's important here to not just look at language as something of the mind, therefore, purely of the thinking process of man. Many languages have evolved through spiritual processes and/or a perception beyond human perception, in other words language was created from an inner knowing. Modern day languages are however more about human perceptions but were initially influenced by perceptions beyond human perceptions, at times you can still see this inner knowing through modern day languages.

It is by no mistake I often refer, to what many of us have deemed God's consciousness, as pure consciousness/pure wisdom, this is because it's pure balance, meaning it's of neither one or the other especially to an extreme. This also means there is no extremes of dark or light, positive or negative, bad or good, in other words the absence of judgment period. Pure balance is the absence of judgment because it has no extremes to judge, there are no true opposites so what is there to judge?

It's by no mistake that many of us are trying to learn to live without judgement, this is due to balance being void of judgment, this also means God's consciousness is without judgement.

Now if this God's consciousness is without judgment, it is also void of extremes, this includes light or darkness, this indicates that this God's consciousness isn't of light but of pure balance. Most often we have depicted a God figure in opposition to the devil, the devil of course being representative of darkness in opposition to God's light. I wouldn't myself put this God's consciousness of pure balance in opposition to anything, this is wholly due to this God's consciousness being of pure balance. If this God's consciousness is only of light, it's not of balance therefore it's of judgment, this infers that God's consciousness is of man's consciousness, they are one of the same but there not, this is wholly due to man's consciousness not being of this pure balance.

Pure Consciousness; means a consciousness that is not of judgement for it's this judgment that unbalances a consciousness, a consciousness without judgments is therefore balanced by the lack of judgment. This lack of judgment takes a consciousness to perceive that there is no light or dark, good or bad, except in a reality of motion. As soon as a consciousness is primarily influenced by motion, it becomes judgemental in accordance with the motions being expressed. The more expressive a consciousness becomes, the more judgment a consciousness expresses. Pure consciousness on the other hand is the absence of extraneous influences, the absence of judgement in other words.

Don't get me wrong, this pure consciousness isn't actually pure within itself, it's pure because it's of pure balance, pure bliss. If God's consciousness was to be pure within itself, an opposite would have to also have been created, once you create an opposite, you create judgement. To me this would make this so called pure consciousness impure in my mind, there is nothing pure about judgement but there is of balance.

Wisdom: I also often refer to this God's consciousness as pure wisdom, this is by no a mistake, this is due to this God's consciousness being an observer rather than a participator. It's very difficult being an observer of your own participation, it's of course not impossible either.

It's also wise not to judge a difference as opposed to only observing a difference, this is due to judgment being of motion, however, observing on the other hand takes very little motion.

When we quieten the mind through meditation for example, we most often feel blissful, this is wholly due to lack of motion believe it or not, and yes, we can reflect this blissfulness onto the rest of the world. Basically what we are doing here is influencing the world with pure blissful consciousness, a consciousness void of the motions of judgment. We have in this circumstance replaced  a motion of judgment with a far more motionless expression through the simple process of observing. We would indeed become a lot less destructive through observing more. At the moment, we are judging what is or isn't worthy to ourselves, learning to observe more will make us far less destructive.

Balance: Lacking the knowledge of evil also to me means lacking the knowledge of good, this however doesn't mean being ignorant to evil or good, what this means is lacking the desire to create good or evil which is of course what creates judgement. Knowledge comes about through a desire or a need, there is no desire or need within a pure balanced consciousness!! This is due to this pure balanced consciousness not being of knowledge or intelligence but pure wisdom, this is wholly due that you can't acquire wisdom, you become wisdom basically through balance.

Balance of course takes a consciousness to let go, to let go of control therefore motion, yes, it takes a consciousness to become more motionless. So many people are saying that the Mayan prophecy didn't come true but it did, for example, how many more people are meditating these days? A lot more people, what are we doing when mediating? We are learning to become less of motional expressions and learning to become motionless more often, this is a tiny example of the conscious shift the Mayans talked about. 

The conscious shift is of course a shift towards this pure consciousness. The awareness of judgment these days is also an indication of this shift, this conscious change occurred but we just haven't learnt to observe it yet. To observe takes balance, this is indeed occurring according to my own observations.  

One more thing, you might think to have pure balance there would have to be an opposite, this isn't the case due to this pure balance not being of motions, you can only create an opposite through motion!!         

The Immortal Wisdom Within All Things

Written by Mathew Naismith

Everything within it's entirety is of this wisdom, this wisdom is basically the sprit within all things with no exceptions. We might think we become detached from this but we never truly become detached from this spirit, when we say we are becoming reconnected, we are not really reconnecting at all because we are always of the spirit of wisdom, the inner wisdom. In a mortal reality, we are actually only really remembering we are of this wisdom, there is no true reconnection.

A feeling of a reconnection can only be felt through mortal realities, we do indeed feel like we are reconnecting with ourselves, however, this feeling isn't incorrect, in a mortal reality we are reconnecting with this spirit only because we feel we have become disconnected. Saying that we are reconnecting is quite appropriate while existing in a mortal reality, however, it's wise to remember we were never really disconnected. Being disconnected is simply to do with being unaware, once we become aware, we only then realise we were never really disconnected.

It would seem wisdom comes from the immortal self, I had a person point this out just recently as bellow.                     

The immortal self is the source of wisdom. Perhaps that's something we can agree on.

The seven spirits before the throne of God listed in the bible are:

1. The Spirit of the Lord
2. The Spirit of Wisdom.
3. The Spirit of Understanding.
4. The Spirit of Counsel.
5. The Spirit of Might.
6. The Spirit of Knowledge.
7. The Spirit of Fear of the Lord.

I always find it fascinating that there are 7 Chakras within Buddhism and that the number 7 has such special meaning.

My Rely

It is amazing how it all seems to collate. 

The paradox is, in relation to wisdom and knowledge in mortal realities, knowledge and awareness seem to produce wisdom, this is correct, however, in immortal  realities knowledge and awareness come from wisdom. 

Wisdom depicted as being directly under the lord is correct, wisdom is a direct expression of the lord where knowledge isn't. Knowledge and awareness are expressions of mortal beings, this is why knowledge is directly associated with mortal expressions. 

I don't think wisdom can actually be expressed until a conscientiousness is of mortal expressions. The way we express wisdom is through mortal expressions like awareness and knowledge. 

An expression of wisdom in a mortal existence then becomes awareness and knowledge but only in part. By only expressing part of this wisdom, we run the risk of becoming destructive and chaotic. This is why we can't blame God for everything that happens to us, we actually cause this by only expressing wisdom as knowledge and awareness. Trying to gain wisdom from knowledge and awareness is a risky business, it can create a reality hell bent on chaos. How aware and knowledgeable are we today? We are still creating chaos because we  are still not expressive of wisdom itself. 

Wisdom can't be expressed as it's not of mortal realities, it's too high a vibration to be expressed in mortal realities, this wisdom is then only expressed as awareness and knowledge, not wisdom itself. You are already of the immortal being therefore you are already of wisdom, everything else only becomes a part of this wisdom when in mortal realities. 

What would happen if we were of this wisdom? Realities of mortal existence wouldn't and couldn't exist, this wisdom would cancel them out. Imagine if this God's consciousness enveloped us all, we wouldn't be in a mortal reality any longer, this is true wisdom that can only exist in an immortal reality. This is why in a mortal reality we don't actually ever express wisdom, once a true state of wisdom is reached, we would no longer be in a mortal reality. 

There are wise people but they are never expressive of wisdom itself, knowing and being aware of this wisdom is good enough and that is all we can do in a mortal reality of motion.

Wisdom is of the immortal self, it's infinite where awareness and knowledge isn't infinite, actually awareness and knowledge have no direction until directed by wisdom. Awareness and knowledge are mortal, how may times has human knowledge been changed because it wasn't quite correct, you can't say the same about wisdom. Who's awareness and knowledge is absolutely correct? Again you can't say this about wisdom, actually most wisdom put into words collate with each other, how much of atheistic knowledge and awareness collate with religious knowledge and awareness?

Knowledge and awareness, influenced by wisdom, tell us that God exists in certain realities but wisdom also tells us it doesn't exist in other realities, it's neither one or the other. However, knowledge and awareness, expressed without wisdom, tell us there is no paradox only because a certain knowledge and awareness is correct over all other forms of knowledge and awareness. There is however an obvious paradox in a mortal reality, this depends on the reality a consciousness is experiencing, no one form of awareness and knowledge is of absolute truth within a mortal reality.

An immortal reality on the other hand works quite differently, this is  mainly due to there being no infinite amounts of knowledge and awareness telling us of different perspectives, there is only one perspective brought about by wisdom as opposed to knowledge and awareness.

In an atheistic reality, there is no God, this is correct because there is no higher consciousness within an immortal reality, religion however tells us something quite different within a mortal reality, they are both correct.     

Certain knowledge and awareness (religion) tells us this wisdom is of a God, other forms of knowledge and awareness (spirituality) tell us something quite different, which perspective is correct? Wisdom tells us that both perspectives are correct depending on the consciousness we are experiencing/expressing, there is no true paradox because wisdom tells us it's one of the same. However, knowledge and awareness, used without wisdom, tell us there is a paradox, there is or isn't a God, you can't have a God existing and not have a God existing at the same time but there is, this depends on the perspective. Wisdom tells us we are talking about the same thing but in a different way, depending on the knowledge and awareness we are using and if this knowledge and awareness is being influenced by wisdom.

The many different perspectives of knowledge and awareness certainly complicates the simple, using knowledge and awareness, without wisdom, will complicate life creating chaos, this is obvious. Wisdom is simple, this is why it simplifies these different perspectives and can indeed simplify our reality making it far less chaotic.    

Pure Simple Wisdom

Written by Mathew Naismith

Definition: The Dictionaries simply define wisdom as an  accumulated knowledge or erudition or enlightenment, in other words, according to dictionaries, wisdom is brought about by becoming aware (enlightened). I'm going to state here that this isn't actually true as we are quite clearly showing today, we are more aware than ever but we are just as much, if not more, destructive as ever. I don't actually know of any wise people in human history that were destructive, yes, aware people have been destructive but not the wise. This might seem strange at first until we consider the fundamental differences between wisdom and awareness/knowledge.

What is the essential component of awareness and knowledge, in other words what does awareness and knowledge need the most to even exist in the first place? Motion, and the more motivated this conscious motion is, the more aware and knowledgeable a consciousness (person) becomes. I'm actually going to state here that this isn't the same with wisdom.

Wisdom doesn't need motion to exist, actually, the less a consciousness is of motions, the wiser a consciousness becomes. A wise person will consider the destructive effects of motion brought about by awareness and knowledge, on the other hand, an aware/knowledgeable person void of wisdom will only consider the gains from expressing such motions, warring is a prime example of this and so is materialism.

Any consciousness void of wisdom, will only focus on what these expressions of motion will give them no matter what the cost........sounds very familiar doesn't it!!! Wisdom on the other hand focuses on the holistic, in other words wisdom just doesn't focus on the gains but the cost of these gains as well. A wise person will usually avoid any destructive motions, they will instead focus on constructive motions, motions that serve the collective.

Influx of awareness: We are becoming more aware and knowledgeable on a much larger scale, formal education and the internet are prime examples of this. When you consider that awareness and knowledge take motion, and the more aware and knowledgeable we become the more motions we will express, you start to understand how we have become imbalanced within the collective consciousness itself.  It's all about motion these days, we have become too focused on motions and not focused enough on being motionless, this kind of imbalance is going to quite automatically cause more destruction. The more about awareness and knowledge we become,  the more motion we will express, it's inevitable such extreme motions are going to cause more destruction. This can be avoided if we learn to use this awareness and knowledge coupled (balanced out) with wisdom.

Why does awareness and knowledge work so well when used in unison with wisdom?

This is simple, awareness and knowledge are about motion, the more aware and knowledgeable we become, the more motions we express, the internet is a prime example of this. We have obviously become highly expressive of these motions because of our standards of awareness and knowledge these days, these standards have certainly risen significantly in the past couple of decades. In the mean time some of us have become more destructive, cyber bullying is a prime example of this, this was inevitable.  Any consciousness becoming more aware and knowledge, will at times, express this kind of consciousness in a destructive way, this is so normal it's not funny.

Wisdom on the other hand is more about a motionless state of consciousness, when a wise person expresses themselves, it's usually expressed in a subtle way. This is what I call whispering as opposed to shouting. A consciousness that is aware and knowledgeable but void of wisdom will naturally shout and of course cause more destruction, however, a consciousness influenced by wisdom will more likely whisper, this whispering is usually constructive.         

We also on the other hand have people who are more about motionlessness these days as well, this naturally gives them wisdom, you will notice this kind of consciousness will  more likely be constructive within it's motions. Praying, chanting, meditating, etc. are prime examples of us learning to be less about motions and more about motionlessness. The more we balance out motions with motionlessness, the more wiser we are becoming, this is all due to wisdom being of motionlessness. Wisdom is also to do with the immortal self, this figures because the immortal self is also more of being motionless.

Wisdom; has nothing to do with awareness and knowledge, this seems this way because, to become wise in a reality of motion, we first need to become aware/knowing especially of our immortal motionless consciousness. This isn't the case when you are already in this  immortal motionless conscious state.

There is no motion in this state because there is no awareness and knowledge a consciousness needs to strive for,  we might think here this is because this motionless state of consciousness is pure awareness, no motion is needed to become aware. In one sense this is true, however, for a consciousness to become aware of their own awareness is an expression of a motion, you are no longer in a true motionless state of consciousness once this awareness is expressed/known to a consciousness as any expression depicts motion.

This motionless state of consciousness is pure wisdom which awareness and knowledge are created from. In our present state of conscious motions, this wisdom is depicted as pure awareness, this perception isn't incorrect because of the state of consciousness we are presently in. If however we were in this immortal motionless state of consciousness, there is no motion therefore no awareness and knowledge but pure wisdom.

It's interesting in how awareness and knowledge are created from wisdom, to us it's a paradox because to create awareness and wisdom in the first place, takes a consciousness to become  unaware. You can only express awareness and knowledge, which creates motions, if a consciousness is unaware of it's own expressions of consciousness itself. How unaware are we of our own immortality for example? To become aware of our own immortality, we express numerous motions by gaining awareness and knowledge. A consciousness then gets themselves into trouble when they express this awareness and knowledge without balancing these expressions with wisdom. The paradox is, to become aware of balancing out awareness and knowledge  takes awareness and knowledge to do so in the first place in a reality of motion. 

This is why we exist in a reality of motion, everything around us is an expression of awareness and knowledge, this however changes when a consciousness becomes fully aware that there is no awareness and knowledge in a true motionless state, only pure wisdom. Yes, to us presently existing in a reality of motion, this motionless state is going to seem like pure awareness, like I said, this perception isn't incorrect, it's just not totally correct as we will find out eventually.        

               

So Small But So Powerful

Written by Mathew Naismith 

This is a strange title for me to have for one of my posts,  I will explain about this a little latter on, first of all lets look at an interesting question, how big is the spirit within everything? Actually, it's minute (small). Let's now look at what created this universe, matter and anti-matter coming into contact with each other, in other words it was tiny particles coming together that created this vast ever expanding universe. The amazing thing is, what created these particles is even smaller still, this means this God's consciousness is even smaller than these particles. I should state here, the only way I know how to effectively relate to this pure consciousness is explain it as God's consciousness.

Because we exist in a reality of motion, any other consciousness expressing more awareness is going to seem larger than our own,  this means the more aware we become, the more space we need to store this awareness. This isn't so, it's actually a paradox, the more aware a consciousness becomes, the less space it takes up because the less it expresses this consciousness, in other words it's the expressions of a consciousness that expands on it's size. For a good example of this lets look at man's own expressions, the more he expresses himself, the more he influences, this planet is a prime example of this.

How much storage space has man needed to store his awareness? You might think the more aware man has become, the more storage space he needed such as books for example, this is true but only to a certain extent. How big are the storage spaces today?  The electronic storage spaces are actually now becoming smaller the more aware we become collectively, we have actually come to a point where we are now reversing the process of expanding on consciousness through motion.

It's actually the expression of consciousness that makes consciousness itself expend, not the accumulation of knowledge and  awareness itself. As we are finding out, this knowledge and awareness can be stored in very small places, this is until we express this awareness, a soon a we express this awareness from these tiny devices, this awareness expands quite automatically from such expressions, the universe is a prime example of this. I think this alone tells us by what means this universe was created, yes it was created by matter and anti-matter coming together but what expressed this kind of motion in the first place?

There was no movement within this space where matter and anti-matter existed because there was no space or time to begin with, if there was no space, what kind of force influenced matter and anti-matter to come together to create a vast universe?  I believe time, as of everything, has always existed but not as an expression, as soon as time was expressed, space was created for motion to occur. This means the  expression of motion automatically creates it's own space, man again is a prime example of this through the creation of smaller storage spaces for example. You can't have motion without time or space, also, all expression take a form of consciousness to cause motion. If man's awareness can store knowledge and awareness in tinier places, how small of a place (space) would be needed for this God's consciousness that is far far more aware? This universe certainly didn't happen by accident!!

Power: In previous posts, I stated that the use of the word power doesn't belong in spirituality, this is due to power denoting control, true spirituality isn't about control but releasing control. Only through the expression of consciousness is power perceived as control, when this consciousness is in it's purest form, in other words motionless state,  power can't exist mainly because there is no consciousness being expressed in this state. Basically, this is due to the absence of ego and of course motion is ego created from expression of time.     

I referred to this very tiny God's consciousness as being powerful because in our perception it is powerful, so much has been created from such a tiny thing, how do you explain this without relating to power?  Power however in this case refers to the vast expansion of consciousness from such a tiny thing, in my perception, it has nothing to do with control.

Wisdom: The more aware human consciousness becomes, the tinier the storage devices are becoming even though we are accumulating even more knowledge and awareness. It's a shame we can't store wisdom itself, yes we have stored the wisdom from others but this isn't wisdom itself, this is because wisdom isn't an actual expression or even able to be expressed. The wiser a consciousness becomes, the less expressive they are of conciseness, this is all due to becoming less about motion and more about motionlessness (God's consciousness). This kind of consciousness subtly expresses awareness and knowledge but it's not actually expressing wisdom itself.

Wisdom only comes about through being in a motionless state of consciousness, this might sound ridiculous, all the people who are wise are highly knowledgeable and aware and expressive of this knowledge and awareness, their obviously all about motion!!  Not so, again, what is being expressed is awareness and knowledge, not wisdom itself, you cannot express wisdom itself, you can however use wisdom to better express consciousness itself.  This is important to becomes aware of if we want to become wise, wisdom isn't an expression but can help us express awareness and knowledge more subtly without causing too much motion therefore chaos. 

Again, spirituality is about becoming a whisperer (less about motion), not a yeller (more about motion), and of course only through whispering can we gain wisdom, as of this God's consciousness, motionless within one's consciousness. You cannot however become a whisperer without awareness and knowledge, in a reality of motion, this is gained through motion but only the wise will gain this through subtle expressions of motions. This is why it's wise to balance out motion with motionlessness for only in this motionless will we find true wisdom. 

There is another way to gain awareness and knowledge without any motion what so ever, direct contact with this God's consciousness, the paradox is, you can't have direct contact unless you are wise, this is why so many spiritual practices are about being in a state of less motion which gives us more wisdom I feel. 

You might think all this took a lot of thought, actually it didn't, what takes a lot of thought is putting this into words so that others can comprehend what I am trying to relay on here, I hope I have accomplished just that.    

What Actually Produces Judgement?

Written by Mathew Naismith

Education and judgement: We ask the question, “What actually produces judgment?”, and we come up with ego, you obviously can’t judge or misjudge without an ego being present for only through the ego can we judge. This post however isn’t just about the ego producing judgment but how the ego produces (creates) this judgement.

We can express ego traits without being in judgment,  it’s called observing a situation without comparing one situation to another, for example, “it’s a beautiful day just because it makes you feel good”, you’re not comparing this to a day that made you feel bad. Judging is comparing one to another and forming a critical opinion, one being more worthy than another to experience, in this case a day that made you feel bad can influence us to make judgment on this day by experiencing a day that didn’t make us feel bad. We then judge this day to be worthy of experiencing, this however actually doesn’t tell us how judgment is formed until we become aware of an imbalance, an imbalance that causes us to judge a situation instead of just observing a situation without judgment or prejudice.  

Yes, I’m saying judgment is caused by an imbalance, an imbalance brought about by how we think, it’s an imbalance of the thinking processes we are conditioned too from birth.  How many people are brought up on a certain style of education, like for example, an education predominantly influenced by religious teachings or hands on skills like farming or even, and probably especially, an education based purely on academics. I have observed on numerous occasions, that highly educated people can also be highly prejudice against anyone not  educated to the same degree, actually, I have even observed these people show prejudice against more highly educated people than themselves. There is an obvious imbalance here and it’s all to do with the way we are taught to think.   

The following is a reply I received from one of my posts, strangely enough, this person didn’t read my actual post but the replies I received from another person in judgment of my poor grammar and writing skills. I’m certainly not the best writer around but I do have my own writing style that doesn’t suite everyone. I come from the bush and my writing style can most often reflect this, I’m OK with this but some people aren’t and that’s Ok too.

The following reply I received, and my subsequent reply back to this person,  reflects on a certain kind of education, a style of education that the governments of the day desisted in financially supporting in Australia. The kind of education is question obviously offered, to a point, a balanced education.               

    

Good old Yallourn tech, no it was "a" technical trade orientated school! We need these types of schools back so the current teenagers get some good quality skills behind them, instead of being keyboard warriors, like some person above! Which he must have gone to "an" elementary school!!! 

My Rely

Technical trade schools were about obtaining a balanced education between hands on skills and technical thinking, not many educational establishments these days teach on this level. 

As of anything, balance is the key like a balanced diet for example or a balanced mentality which helps one analyse situations and people without bias, it would seem Theadore lacks this kind balanced education. 

As usual , one can know all there is to know and still not  know how to use this knowledge, a balanced education gives one this knowledge I believe. 

My post is about everything being in the now, meaning, when you think of the past, present or future, it's all in the present moment. Yes, my grammar isn't perfect, too much country comes out in the post at times but that is my writing style, that is who I am and I'm proud of it no matter how many flaws it has according to others with an obvious unbalanced education. 

It's sad that they closed these schools but this is a typical  knee jerk reaction you will get from people with an unbalanced education. We wonder why the worlds in a mess, it's dominated by people with a high level of education who know nothing in how to use this knowledge in a balanced way.  

All this knowledge is fine but do we know how to use this knowledge wisely and in an unbiased way? Wisdom gives balance to knowledge, knowledge obviously doesn't give one wisdom, this is obtained through a balanced education which the world lacks at present. 

Prior to going to a technical college, I was  also educated at what was called a technical high school, these schools were also shut down by the government of the day.

Wisdom; comes from a balanced outlook that  comes from a balanced education, not from the huge amount of knowledge we can store inside our heads, if this was the case, the world wouldn’t be going through what it is at present. There is no wisdom in chaos and destruction, we are not lead by wisdom but by a highly educated system which obviously doesn’t know how to use this knowledge constructively.

My own education sadly lacked spiritual teachings, even though I was educated in technical skills, I lacked the balance of spiritual teachings , to a point, I made up for this. How many schools today even teach philosophy? Philosophy can teach you to think outside the square, outside conditioned teachings.

It’s not what we know or how much we know, it’s how we use  what we know that shows how wise we have become. This wisdom isn’t obtained through what we know or how much we know, it’s produced by a balanced education and the more balanced an education is, the less you will judge and misjudge. Wisdom isn’t about judgment, it’s about observations without judgement and prejudice, this I feel can only be obtained through a balanced education.

If you lack a balanced education, try balancing this out with your own studies. I don’t myself think much of human knowledge and know how, in a lot of cases it certainly lacks wisdom in my mind, however, if this education is helping to give you balance, go for it by all means, we need more people with a balanced thinking process that stops us judging and prejudging as we are at present.

Can a balanced education lesson our judgmental attitude? In my mind most definitely.  

Evil Intent??

Written by Mathew Naismith

I recently watched the movie The Conjuring which is based on true case files of the Warren family, the movie was about a family who experienced various paranormal events when they moved into their newly purchased house. The paranormal events that took place, you could easily describe as spirits/souls of evil intent, this is a human perception which isn't wrong or right as I will explain. 

What is evil intent? It's an action that is seen to be evil when expressed in relation to our own lives, in comparison to our own every day lives, this kind of existence is going to seem evil, however, when you compare such paranormal events to an existence of the same kind of consciousness, this kind of paranormal event doesn't seem evil at all. In all, it's just another way consciousness can express itself, we can all choose to exist in this way if we want to.

I have myself experienced simular forms of paranormal activity that I would indeed describe as entities with evil intent,  they were extremely frightening and threatening, this is until I became aware of what creates such consciousness, a consciousness that  expresses itself in such an unbecoming way. Again it's only unbecoming to us because we are not used of such conscious expressions, this is certainly expected.

Once I became aware of what was truly happening, I just laughed in there presence, this was enough to disperse them, they do not like anyone being aware beyond human perceptions and intentions. There is a very good reason why such an aware action would disperse them, such unbecoming conscious entities are after all living in ignorance, any show of awareness is discomforting to them. This is funny because most of these entities are very knowledgeable and intelligent but on the other hand they lack any true awareness and wisdom, this makes them vulnerable but also very dangerous to anyone who allows such entities to influence them who are unaware of their vulnerability.

These intelligent entities love to show off in such realties as our own, this is mainly due to most of us being unaware and unwise, we have actually created a perfect reality for such entities. These entities can manipulate physical consciousness, they can speak Latin backwards and recite passages in many different languages, what they can't do is become aware of our true nature or express true wisdom and love, only in deceit. We on the other hand can become aware of any expression of consciousness, this is an expression of true awareness and wisdom, being aware of any expression of consciousness especially without disdain for such consciousness. This means avoiding expressing any kind of disdain for any expression of consciousness, this is including any consciousness expressive of evil intent.

Life is a game to these entities, they know we hold life dearly to the extent of being fixated to life itself. They get a huge thrill in threatening in taking such life away from people, the reactions they get from these people incites them to go further and further. They loved scaring the hell out of me as they do of anyone, life to them is a laughable matter, how can any form of consciousness be so attached to life when life as we know it isn't really the norm. This is saying physical life isn't the norm as we perceive and it's this perception they play on. 

Do not underestimate any entities we deem as of evil intent, they are very clever, knowledgeable and cunning, in a sense I admire them because of their ingenuity, they have adapted so well to realties like this one.

Now the best way for a reality, a collective consciousness, to disperse them is to become aware and wise from a state of knowledge and intelligence. You could say we are half way there, we have knowledge and intelligence but we lack the awareness and wisdom to know how to use such knowledge and intelligence. We are collectively at a vulnerable stage, we have the knowledge and intelligence, like these entities, but most of us still lack the awareness and wisdom. This Makes us so simular to these entities with evil intent as we still lack the awareness and wisdom, this is of course changing in a lot of us and we must keep on going this way.

Of course sharing such experiences as this helps us all, we become more aware and wiser as we observe. It's however important to be able to observe any conscious expression with a smile on your face for it's this smile that shows us how aware and wise we are becoming.                 

To Love and be Loved

Written by Mathew Naismith

“To love is to not live in the darkness of ignorance but to live without the ego telling us how to love and be loved, awareness is the true essence of being of love.”

Is awareness and wisdom the ability to love and be loved without the ego telling us how? I think wisdom in particular is all about being able to be expressive without having to be told how to be so expressive in such ways.

Is ignorance, as a whole, linked to the controlling factors of the ego? The ego is about the (I) as opposed to the (we), if we are focused on the (I), have we not then become ignorant of the (we)?

We are therefore living in the darkness of ignorance if we allow the ego to show us how to love and be loved, the funny thing is most of us know no other way!!

Awareness gives us the wisdom to look beyond our egos to love and be loved as (we) not as (I). 

Neutral Thinking and Wisdom

Written by Mathew Naismith

We tend to judge ourselves and others as either positively or negatively thinking at any given time, we give no heart or credence in neutrally thinking which I think is a more natural way to think.  No other animal in nature thinks either positively or negatively, thinking positively or negatively isn’t a natural part of nature or mother Earth, so what makes us so different? The answer is simple, ego; no other living form other than man has a controlling ego. What is this neutral thinking we seem to have lost through the over use of the ego?

Neutral thinking doesn’t need an opposite to exist, positive thinking needs a negative to exist to compare itself with, if there wasn’t a negative to compare with, how would one know one was positive? The same goes with negative thinking, negatives can’t exist without an opposing polarity such as positivity however on the other hand neutral thinking needs no opposite to exist, what does this mean?

When we think of positives we think constructiveness and when we think of negativity we think of destructiveness but what do we think when we are neutrally thinking? Our first thought would be neither because neutral thinking isn’t of judging a negative nor a positive, therefore neutral thinking is of neither of destructive nor constructive thought. This isn’t actually the case with neutral thinking as I will explain.

Take positive thinking, NATO positively thought it could win certain wars but are wars either destructive or constructive? They are both which depends on a lot of factors like who loses or wins a war or who materially benefits from such wars but it is obvious wars are mostly destructive.  You can’t only label positivity with constructiveness; it is obvious positive thinking can be extremely destructive.  Now what if we only used neutral thinking, would wars exist or could wars exist? 

Wars just wouldn’t exist; we wouldn’t contemplate wars, not just because we don’t think negatively or positively but because wars would be seen as being destructive.  Hang on here, how would a person who neutrally thinks judge war as being destructive or not, once you have judged you are not neutral in thought?   A neutral mind isn’t dead or stagnate in thought, it observes what isn’t or is destructive, it’s not judging destructiveness as being negative or bad it’s just an obvious observation of how destructive a war or anything of this nature can be.  You could say a neutral mind is a wise mind, it’s wised up to how even constructiveness can be destructive for example, constructing a house in the bush/forest, what are we destroying while we are being constructive?  This is why a neutral thinking is more natural, it’s aware of nature which we are also a part of.

I would say deciding not to conduct ourselves in wars would be of wisdom, taking on neutral thinking would be the wisest thing we could do because it’s obvious it would mean no more wars  or conducting ourselves in any other kind of destructiveness. 

Neutral thinking does however take us to make certain sacrifices like ridding ourselves of judgment which means we no longer judge ourselves as being positive and others of being negative.  It will take us to rid ourselves of the controlling factors of the ego. This might seem difficult, maybe too difficult but it’s not really, all it will take is to not judge a right or wrong, good or bad, positive or negative period.  It’s really easier than you think, all what you need to do is not judge how difficult it would be to do this in the first place.

It is also advisable not to judge judgement as being bad or negative in some way, ask yourself, is judgment bad or negative while your mind is not in judgment?   If you are truly not in judgement it is neither one thing nor another, it’s just another way to think and exist and it can either be destructive or constructive when only observed and not judged.   In all however we really do need to rid ourselves of judgment and learn to only observe through neutral thinking if we want to become more constructive instead of destructive.   I should also state that neutral thinking connects us more to the inner self for the main reason the inner self isn’t of judgment but of observation.  

Spirituality of Awareness, Love, Light and Wisdom

Written by Mathew Naismith

Sitting back observing myself and others becoming aware, and further aware, gives me a view that spirituality void of any dogmas is of the light, a light within the darkness of ignorance.  Ignorance gives us ego, without ignorance the ego would be of little consequence; the ego certainly wouldn’t be ruling/controlling us without ignorance so why live in a reality based on ignorance especially considering ignorance can be quite destructive?

The reason ignorance is so destructive is this ego creates egotism and the more ignorant we are the more egotistical we become, for example, a lot of white men had slaves who were black. The reason for this is because black people were deemed as inferior to white people, an obvious show of utter ignorance and to own slaves had a lot to do with egotism as well showing ignorance and egotism goes hand in hand.  We can try all we like to take the controlling ego tendencies out of our lives but the controlling ego will always come back if we still live in ignorance as we are still creating an environment for the ego to exist in.  The easiest and surest way to rid ourselves of the controlling factors of the ego is rid ourselves of ignorance; the way to do this is become aware like through spiritual awareness.

Ignorance is related to the controlling ego and all of the ego’s tendencies, ignorance is also related to darkness in not being able to see and feel beyond our own ignorance, our own impeded awareness.  Ignorance is also related to a lack of wisdom, not being able to acknowledge what our own knowledge is destroying and how a lack of wisdom is impeding our common sense.  It makes sense why we are still warring and polluting the very thing we rely on for our own survival, we are still living in ignorance, so what are we living in ignorance of?

As mentioned, wisdom is one of these things we are ignorant too, without wisdom we are unable to use any knowledge sensibly and constructively but this is but one attribute that ignorance obscures from us.  The more aware, void of the controlling factors of the ego we become, the more loving we became and the more of the light we also become.  Wisdom tells us to become aware and while becoming aware we must also become unattached to the controlling factors of the ego, wisdom shows us away to become light and love instead of the darkness and chaos. One way to do this is become aware of our own ignorance first of all and how man has nearly always lived in ignorance. 

Becoming aware will not automatically disperse the ego even though we are no longer ignorant but aware, are we truly aware without being aware of wisdom; we must not just be spiritually aware but spiritually wise.  The only thing that can really dispel ignorance isn’t awareness or knowledge, it’s wisdom, the wisdom in knowing how to use such awareness and knowledge in the first place.  Science is about awareness and knowledge but look at how science is destroying our environment, this isn’t very wise, actually it’s ignorance of the harm of such effects science endeavours has on ourselves and the environment. 

How do we become wise instead of just knowledgeable?  Books are a good source of showing us how to use wisdom, so many of us these days use books, not just to become knowledgeable but wise. Certain literature teaches us to be wise even though we are unaware of this however not all literature will teach us wisdom.  If I was to read literature on Quantum mechanics, would I then be wise or would I just be more knowledgeable about quantum mechanics?  One must take notice if certain literature is teaching us how to use this knowledge wisely not just telling us about a kind of knowledge.  Man has learnt how to split the atom, has he learnt to use it wisely and constructively?  

Literature doesn’t have to be just a source of knowledge but wisdom. If I read literature on someone else’s actual experiences, am I just learning knowledge or am I learning to be wise as well?  I’m learning to be wise as well because I am actually reading about actual experiences, actual experiences are of wisdom.  Can I gain wisdom only through knowledge?  Yes but only to a degree as it’s someone else’s wisdom and knowledge, not our own.  True wisdom comes about by experiencing what we have learnt ourselves through literature not just copying or mimicking someone else’s wisdom, this doesn’t mean we are not learning to be wise through other people’s experiences but to become truly wise we too need to have actual experiences for our own.

Is literature the only way to learn wisdom?  Like I said, our own experiences teach us wisdom which we have learnt through literature but literature isn’t the only way to gain experiences therefore wisdom.  I should also point out not everything we experience ourselves will give us wisdom, how many people go through life who haven’t learnt from their mistakes?  In this case a wise person would learn from others if they are unable to learn for themselves, this can be obtained through literature, other people who have experienced similar mistakes but have learnt from them.  Literature is handy but it’s not the only way to learn wisdom.

Another way to learn wisdom is by becoming connected to inner self or the universal consciousness, this of course again can be learnt through literature or through actual experiences of becoming connected.  Becoming connected without learning how to do this through literature doesn’t suite everyone, in this case these people are best to learn wisdom through literature, through other people’s experiences. At times this connectedness can automatically occur through trauma of some kind or through just being lucky enough to be connected without effort and without learning such things from literature. Learning wisdom to bring us out of our ignorance and into the light of love comes in many forms for us to learn through, once we have begun to become aware and wise, through whatever means, we have begun to dispel ignorance and what ignorance has created, a controlling ego and a reality of chaos.

Awareness and wisdom quite automatically brings us love and light once we start to wisely use what we know, once in the light out of the darkness of ignorance, love becomes a natural phenomenon without effort.  Awareness and wisdom quite automatically creates a reality of love and light where ignorance quite automatically creates an unwise egotistic existence shrouded in darkness and in turn creating a chaotic reality quite automatically.  There is a lot to be said about love and light for they are of awareness and wisdom, awareness and wisdom instinctively creates love and light…….  

Consciousness, Wisdom and Ideological Principles

Written by Mathew Naismith

Man, through an ideological principle as science, has created the God particle and computer simulations that mimic the actual creation of a universe. The ideological principle of science hasn’t done this on it’s own, it’s relied on centuries of awareness and knowledge from many ideological principles to be able to even think of creating a universe, in other word a culmination of human consciousness. We should remember that modern day science would not have existed without philosophy and mysticism to begin with.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03hhyzp

It is quite obvious that one singular ideological principle hasn’t accomplished this on it’s own however it has taken one ideological principle to formulate a conclusion that we are able to create a universe in our own right.

Let’s look at this in a different way, did it take one individual person to create the reality we have today? No, it took many individuals, a collective consciousness to create this reality. One man couldn’t create skyscrapers and complex thought on his own, it has taken a collective consciousness to do that.

Modern day science was created from a culmination of ideological thoughts, science certainly hasn’t accomplished this on it’s own but it has formulated a conclusion that man can create universe’s. Science has produced a dilemma however in creating universe’s. Because science has distanced itself from other ideological principles, is it able to create a universe with the same diverse ideological principles as our own universe remembering it has taken numerous ideologies to give us modern day science to start with?  The answer of course would be no, it might be able to create a physical universe but science on it’s own is unable to create a consciousness that can create the sciences and other ideologies through various other ideologies.  Like one individual person (consciousness) didn’t create this reality, science on it’s own would be unable to create a consciousness that would give us the sciences.

Are the sciences that important to us? Only if we are going to create a universe and expand on consciousness itself from a virtual non-conscious state as what has happened to man. 

What is important to realise here is no matter how clever the sciences get, it won’t be able to create consciousness from a totally non-conscious state, the sciences and other ideologies have only enhanced our conscious awareness not created it and in my mind never will be capable of such things. You need consciousness to create consciousness which a lot of people call God, so does this mean one always needs consciousness to create universe’s? Yes, we are on the verge of creating universe’s which takes consciousness so therefore our universe most likely needed a consciousness as well to create it. Science people are really going to be quite upset when they realise you need consciousness to create consciousness or more precisely, rediscover consciousness through various environments. You can’t create consciousness without consciousness therefore this universe was most likely created from a consciousness far beyond our intelligence, wisdom and understanding at present.

For us to create a universe it has taken a culmination of ideologies to produce more aware ideologies to do this, what about the consciousness within a universe, we have a physical universe but what about a conscious awareness, a consciousness that is aware of what is around it? We needed consciousness to create a physical universe but what about an aware consciousness, where does this come from? For our species, this has come from our surroundings so our surroundings (our environment) create conscious awareness but what is our surrounding (the universe itself) created from? The universe was created from consciousness therefore consciousness needed consciousness to become aware basically of itself, it was a recreation or a remembrance of consciousness itself. What I am saying is this consciousness created a physical universe out of it’s own consciousness with the intentions of certain physical entities recreating a conscious awareness within this physical universe.

At this point man hasn’t the wisdom to be aware that in a physical reality it takes, and has taken, numerous ideological principals learnt from our environment to create the awareness we have today especially people who are in the scientific field.  Yes science can recreate universe’s and God particles but can it create consciousness without consciousness?  Science is unaware that it is unable to do this, yes it is able to create universes but it will never be able to create consciousness itself within a universe, it will be a universe void of any significant awareness unless science uses all the ideological principles of man learnt from his environment.

In a physical existence, it takes more than one ideological principle to form awareness; it takes wisdom to know this in the first place. You can now get an understanding of the immense wisdom it has taken to create this universe; it’s a wisdom that uses all ideological principles as one!!

Wisdom and Science

Written by Mathew Naismith

Even though modern day science derived from mysticism and philosophy, it still at most tries to distance itself from these ideological principles, is this wise?  I don’t think it is wise for the main reason science used on it’s own is very emotionally cold at times, it has little to do with humanity and even ethics as it will do whatever to execute and prove an experiment.  The cruelty done to animals and humans is a good example of this.  Psychology is a science and is about humanity however most sciences don’t take the science of psychology into consideration especially if it’s going to interfere with an experiment.  

What makes things worse for modern day science is the domination by multinationals, it wants it’s pound of flesh no matter what the consequences are and of course one of these consequences is pollution.  

To me, science ideological principles should never be used on their own and should definitely not be dominated by multinationals or any other controlling force controlled primarily by the controlling factors of the ego.  Science to me was never supposed to be used on it’s own, it was obvious what was going to happen if it was, a free for all and total abuse by outside influences more concerned with profits than science itself.  

Where has the wisdom gone within science? If modern day science was controlled, or strongly influenced by wisdom, would modern day science be as destructive? I don’t think so because wisdom would tell the scientists not to experiment on anything that was going to be destructive without taking appropriate precautions.  Today we still have no full proof plan to deal with major nuclear fallouts or leakages; the recent disaster in Fukushima nuclear plant is a good example of this, the cover up of this disaster is amazing.  This is bad science practices controlled by multinational forces.

Science obviously needs to be governed by other ideological principles that are not controlled by the ego to give it ethics and the wisdom to experiment and produce safe constructive science, it is obvious it can’t do this on it’s own and certainly not dominated by a an egotistical force like multinationals.

The following by Prof Tom McLeish is quite interesting only if you are open minded and have no dogmatic ideological principles you hold above all other ideological principles.

http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780198702610.do

Tom McLeish, Professor of Physics and Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Research, University of Durham

Extract: Science finds its place within an old story of participative reconciliation with a nature, of which we start ignorant and fearful, but learn to perceive and work with in wisdom. Surprisingly, science becomes a deeply religious activity. There are urgent lessons for education, the political process of decision-making on science and technology, our relationship with the global environment, and the way that both religious and secular communities alike celebrate and govern science.

Why is Science Such a Pain?  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpD2X-qqL8o

The Collective Wisdom

Written by Mathew Naismith

The following is part of a conversation brought about by my last post, Our Darkest Hours.    

Lorelei

All comments well said by Wise men. Love reading both of your insights regarding the light & dark. Born to be simple. When I try to understand things beyond my comprehension only causes me confusion. So therefore I do not try to get myself to that point because it drags me down to the shadows of the unknown. You both are totally awesome. Its truly a joy to read what enlightened folks have to say. Thank You. Love and Light💟💟💟💟💟✌💕

Tim

I do not consider myself "enlightened," much less a "master." Ongoing experiences with wisdom attainment...yes. And I daresay...you have more intuition, understanding, courage, knowledge, feelings of sisterhood-brotherhood, spiritual insights and wisdom, for which the Universe gives you credit...and I give you credit...but the which you do not yet give to yourself... You are hardly alone... We pretty much all start out our human experiences this way...never laying claim to the spiritual riches and divine inheritance, which is ours for the asking... You, my friend, have so much to give... Keep focusing on the giving and loving, and wisdom-insight will become your true ally... 

Lorelei

Thank You. As always you are awesome👍💟 your right I don't give myself credit and appreciate your reminding of that. Maybe at times I lack self-confidence. However I humbly feel grateful for kindness when it comes my way. Also grateful for the divine love and light of the Universe. Thank You so much💟

Tim

+Lorelei Happy :-)

Mathew

Wisdom's a funny thing Lorelei, if one person is of wisdom, in any reality, so are all. Wisdom isn't just defined by one person because it's never of one person, it belongs to all.

Why don't we all show this wisdom? Opportunity, I've had the opportunity to be expressive of this collective wisdom, it's what I chose to do.

You know why you are wise Lorelei? You know your boundaries, many don't, they will talk about what's beyond their boundaries but how would they know what's beyond their boundaries if they have boundaries? You don't do this which is a very good start to becoming connected to the collective wisdom. All you need to do now is drop these boundaries by not seeing any boundaries and your own perceptions brought on by the shadows in life.

To me you can't own wisdom as you can't own anything else, nothing belongs to us and if nothing belongs to us, including our thoughts and feelings, what boundaries do we have?  I know my feelings aren't my own but that is a very good thing for the collective and myself. If I was to think I own my own feelings I would once again create boundaries that I would have no hope in looking beyond.

Much Blessings,

Mathew

PS I'm actually going to make this conversation into a blog, it just might help others!!

Knowledge, Wisdom and Divine Wisdom

Written by Mathew Naismith

I think the following link, quite well I thought, shows the difference between knowledge and wisdom, the link shows a teacher’s and there students response in exploring the difference between knowledge and wisdom .  

http://numberedpages.com/2012/01/26/knowledge-vs-wisdom/  

This might not seem important to know but at times it’s handy to know what was written as knowledge and what was written as wisdom. The reason this is handy is so we don’t misconstrued what is written in the first place.  I feel a lot of old text in particular has been misconstrued because of the way they were read and deciphered, were these texts written as knowledge, wisdom or even divine wisdom?  This will define how we read these texts to get a better understanding for ourselves.

Before I go on I think it’s wise if we give a brief dictionary definition of knowledge and wisdom here as I feel this will assist us in understanding more the difference between wisdom and knowledge.

Wikipedia

Wisdom is the ability to think and act using knowledge, experience, understanding, common sense, and insight.

Knowledge is a familiarity, awareness or understanding of someone or something, such as facts, information, descriptions, or skills, which is acquired through experience or education by perceiving, discovering, or learning.

I believe there is of course another definition that also needs to be considered here, that is eternal divine wisdom. Because human knowledge is time based, in other words created through time, human knowledge is limited to time as indeed so is any wisdom gained from time however divine wisdom isn’t limited to time, it is timelessness so it has no limitations unlike human wisdom.  There is also something else to be considered here, I believe a lot of old and new texts and writings are written from wisdom that isn’t limited by time, in other words it’s of divine in nature. I think the bible, kabbalah, Mayan text and so on are of this limitless divine wisdom, the problem is we can mistakenly read this as being of knowledge only and not of wisdom and certainly not divine wisdom.  

Take an atheist for example, they will read the bible, Koran, Torah and so forth as being of knowledge only and a lot of believers will read these texts as wisdom but there are others who read these same texts as being of divine wisdom, a wisdom not limited by time itself.  So could anyone pick up these texts and just read them as being of divine wisdom?  I believe most definitely not, not to decipher them correctly anyway, one needs to first be able to think in timelessness because let’s face it, we are reading something of timelessness not of time; this isn’t of man’s knowledge or even wisdom but divine wisdom we are talking about here.  No wonder atheists have no idea, it’s really not their fault as they can’t read anything beyond of time!!

The following links just might help you think out of time and really open your mind up to what you are actually reading. Once you start to think out of time, and even space, a whole new world of understanding will flurry into your world, it will feel like a totally different more vibrant dimension.  

Note: You will have to choose which link suits you best as they give quite a different view on the matter of thinking beyond time.

http://www.dreammanifesto.com/the-tenth-dimension-thinking-beyond-time-space.html

http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/bridging_the_gap_between_science_and_spirituality_consciousness_beyond_time.html

Why do people meditate?  I feel it is to break away from thinking in time because while we are thinking in time we are thinking chaotically to one extent or another but once we meditate, time has no relevance, the chaos within our thoughts disappear. This is the reason why we don’t think we think when in mediation, it’s of timeless thought, it’s also more about wisdom than knowledge I believe.  I also believe meditation is one of the better ways to learn to think out of time in everyday life.     

http://www.meditatelikeagirl.com/magazine/eighth-chakra-meditation-beyond-time-and-space

Note: Please don’t take anything I have written here as gospel, it’s really my own personal view on this topic that’s all……